Stephen Gardner and Trump lawyer Will Scarf https://x.com/willscharf discuss the Trump NYC cases, the sentencing date change, the supreme court and more.

– **Introduction**: Will Scharf, a lawyer for Trump in the New York case against DA Alvin Bragg, discusses recent developments and their implications.

– **Judge Juan Merchan’s Recent Decision**:
– Judge Juan Merchan called for Trump’s sentencing to be moved to mid-September.
– Scharf explains how this decision came about and discusses whether it’s advantageous or detrimental for Trump.
– He highlights the strategic considerations behind the timing of the sentencing.

– **Motivations Behind the Legal Actions Against Trump**:
– Scharf shares his perspective on whether the goal is to arrest Trump or to tarnish his image without crossing the line of jailing him.
– He emphasizes the political motivations and the potential consequences of different legal outcomes.

– **Supreme Court and Trump**:
– Discussion on how Democrats portray the conservative justices on the Supreme Court as colluding with Trump.
– Scharf argues that the justices clarified the laws for all presidents, not just Trump.
– He delves into the complexities of Supreme Court rulings and addresses the misconception that the justices are delaying decisions in favor of Trump.

– **Bias and Perception of Judges**:
– Scharf discusses the double standards in how Democrats view different judges.
– He explains why Judge Arthur Engoron and Judge Juan Merchan are seen as unbiased and righteous by Democrats, while Judge Aileen Cannon is demonized.
– The conversation touches on the broader implications of judicial bias and political motivations.

– **Call for Biden’s Cognitive Testing**:
– Scharf comments on CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s, suggestion that Joe Biden should undergo detailed cognitive testing following his debate performance.
– He discusses the potential impact of such testing on Biden’s political standing and public perception.

– **First Black Woman President Mention**:
– Brief mention of the historic significance of having the first black woman serve as president, though not directly related to the legal discussions.

– **Closing Remarks**: Scharf concludes by summarizing the key points discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding the legal and political nuances in the cases against Trump.

**Detailed Points**:

1. **Judge Juan Merchan’s Decision**:
– The timing of Trump’s sentencing is critical, potentially impacting his political strategies and public perception.
– Scharf analyzes the legal reasoning and strategic implications of moving the sentencing to mid-September.

2. **Arrest vs. Image Destruction**:
– Scharf argues that the aim might be to leave Trump with a destroyed image rather than arresting him, as jailing a former president could be seen as crossing a line.
– He explores the political calculations behind the legal actions and their potential impact on Trump’s future.

3. **Supreme Court’s Role**:
– The Supreme Court’s rulings have broader implications for presidential powers and legal clarifications.
– Scharf discusses the perception of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices and their rulings related to Trump.
– He addresses the narrative that the justices are either delaying or rushing decisions based on political motivations.

4. **Judicial Bias and Political Perceptions**:
– The contrasting perceptions of judges like Engoron, Merchan, and Cannon highlight the political bias in the judicial system.
– Scharf emphasizes the importance of unbiased judicial proceedings and the impact of political narratives on public trust in the judiciary.

5. **Biden’s Cognitive Testing**:
– The suggestion for Biden’s cognitive testing brings up questions about his mental fitness and ability to lead.
– Scharf discusses the potential implications for Biden’s presidency and the upcoming elections.

6. **Historical Context**:
– The mention of the first black woman president adds a historical context to the discussion, highlighting significant milestones in political representation.

7. **Conclusion**:
– Scharf’s insights provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal and political landscape surrounding Trump’s cases.
– He underscores the importance of critical analysis and awareness of the broader implications of these legal proceedings.