Visit http://fieldofgreens.com and use promo code GARDNER for 15% off and free shipping. Stephen Gardner and Terry Schilling https://americanprinciplesproject.org/ discuss the disaster ABC debate. But whats shocked us both is the polling and the independent voter response. Follow on Twitter https://x.com/Schilling1776
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators’ direct actions/inactions to affect viewersâ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not âbias.”
Itâs much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of âfact checkers” the inference is that the absence of a âfact checkâ confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly âfact checked,â while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
Letâs watch the clip and then Iâll prove the lies.
Run Trump against 3 video
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamalaâs behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesnât acknowledging the validity of Trumpâs statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her âanswer” he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trumpâs âpeacefully and patrioticallyâ comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that âsome” police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville âFine Peopleâ hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the âstand back and stand byâ hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a âmilitiaâ to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the âbloodbath” hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.